Short Selling, Part Six
Tuesday, September 2nd, 2008
Last time in this blog, we started discussing the ethics of short selling. We mentioned how it’s often the case that short sellers are looked up with something of a blend of derision and skepticism simply because their own profit is dependent upon the losses of others. However true this may or may not be, there are more pressing accusations being leveled against the short seller that demand our attention; namely, the accusation that short sellers actually harm the market.
Controversy Surrounding Short Sellers
Many of you might remember the huge stock market crash back in 1987. While there were a lot of contributing factors to that fiasco, such as the sharp increase in program trading around that time, there are many who are eager to blame the entire situation on short sellers. While there’s not a ton of evidence to support this claim, there’s enough of a correlation between spikes in short selling and downturns in the market for market regulators to have enacted certain guidelines and limitations that inhibit the short seller’s ability to actually affect the direction of the market.
Contribution To The Market
Of course, for all these claims of being bad for the market, there is one aspect of short selling that undeniably makes a contribution to the market that can’t come from anywhere else. It provides a sense of liquidity to the market, keeping trades fluid, and while it tends to drive down the price of stocks overall, it also tends to drive down those that are actually overpriced and should be driven down. In this sense, short sellers can be seen as a fail safe measure against those who would seek to commit fraud by introducing securities that they know are unstable and will soon crash on hopeful investors.
All in all, short selling is a give and take kind of situation. While many aren’t fans of it, they allow it to stick around because of the undeniable benefits that it offers the market in general. Next time, however, we’ll need to take a look at one aspect of short selling that is all-around negative: those investors who make use of distinctly unethical tactics in order to facilitate their short selling.
See you next week for part 7 of Short Selling.
Sean Rasmussen
The Bullhunters Guide
Universal Wealth Creation © 2004 - 2008







Hi again. Recently in this blog, we’ve been covering the topic of
However, perhaps more importantly than this emotional impression of short selling, is the argument that short selling can actually have a detrimental effect on the overall status of the market. More than just being a practice founded in betting against one’s neighbour, it is often said that short selling actively works to bring down the market as a motivated force in itself. Next time around, we’re going to take a look at these accusations and see just what truth there is to them, if any.
Over the last few entries, we’ve taken quite a detailed look at the process of
Lastly, short selling automatically involves the practice of trading on margin. This entails the use of borrowed money, which is a risky proposition in and of itself even without the added dangers of short selling stacked on top of it. You might fall prey to sudden margin calls even, which is one of the most disastrous things that can befall a trader. Even if you’re right, it might take quite a while for your stock to decrease in value, and in the meantime, you’ll be sitting on short sold stocks bought on margin that are increasing in interest and ultimately costing you money.
Last time, we talked about how short selling is a
Flash forward a few months and we can see two possible outcomes. In the first, your predictions proved to be correct, and the value of the stock dropped from $100 to $50. Now, you’re forced to buy back the stock in question that you short sold, but in so doing, you’re only spending $500. That’s $500 profit on your initial investment!
Last time in this blog, we introduced the
One typically engages in short selling when they expect that the value of a stock is about to fall soon. Say that you short sell on a stock that is worth $1000. You do this and the broker gives you that $1000. Then, before the time period expires in which you have to actually buy the stock in question, the stock collapses and is worth only $500. You’ve just made $500 off the decline of a stock!


