Stock Picking Strategies, Part Ten: Technical Analysis
Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008Today, we’re going to wrap up our series on stock picking strategies. Over the course of this series, we’ve looked at the stock picking strategies that are most commonly employed to great success by those who’ve been in the investment game for a while. While we recognize that no one strategy is going to produce a winner every time, we thought it was worthwhile to look at these notorious techniques to see what each one had to offer in comparison to the others.
As is fitting for a series like this, the last stock picking strategy we’re going to look at is one that is completely different in every possible way from everything that came before. While up until now, the underlying basis of every strategy we’ve covered has been the principle of fundamental analysis, today we’re going to turn that on its head by looking at technical analysis.
Technical Analysis
Technical analysis is focused almost entirely on the view of the market as a whole, with an eye towards its predictable trends and future prices, rather than the makeup and foundation of any one company. As a result, it’s the most predictive of stock picking methods, and in some ways the most radical. It is not without those who swear by it, though.
Technical analysis asserts that just by looking at the prices on the market, we can learn a lot about where that market is moving, because prices tend to move in trends. Working from the maxim that history tends to repeat itself, technical analysts often invest in those companies that show good trends based on market charts, rather than the intrinsic value of the company behind a stock.
Lookout For Market Movements
For that reason, many decry technical analysis as a stock picking strategy with no long term usage. And indeed it isn’t. That said, it never claimed to be. Because a technical analyst is constantly on the lookout for market movements, he or she tends to spend little time sitting on any one stock for very long. They prefer to soak up the profits (or losses) from rapid movements, and then move on, rather than worry about the long term gains to be had from any one stock.
That wraps up our series on the most popular and arguably effective stock picking strategies. Hopefully by now you’ve learned enough to start developing your own strategies, and that they’ll pay off for you in the long run. Join us next time as we embark on an all new avenue of exploration in the exciting world of stock market investment.
Thank you for hanging around for Bullhunter’s second investment series: Part 1 – 10 of Stock Picking Strategies.
Sean Rasmussen
The Bullhunters Guide
Universal Wealth Creation © 2004 - 2008







Today, we’re going to look at what is probably one of the simplest methods in all of investing. This method was first presented in a book by Michael Higgins called “Beating the Dow”, and is commonly known as the “Dogs of the Dow” method. Selecting stocks by this method couldn’t be easier. You simply take a look at the top 30 companies with the highest dividend yields, according to the
Clearly, this
Last time in this blog, we began to discuss the CANSLIM method of 
The M stands for “Market Direction”. This means that a CANSLIM strategist must look not only at the stock in question, but at the entirety of the market in question. Whether or not the market as a whole is moving up or down has a big effect on the profitability of a stock. Even if all the other six factors seem sound, the company will probably not succeed and generate profits in a
Having discussed all the basic and secondary strategies already, we’re going to move on to a stock picking strategy that represents something of a modern hybrid of picking techniques. It’s known as CANSLIM, and the whole idea is that it allows one to pay attention to a lot of different objective factors at the same time (seven to be exact) in an attempt to pick a stock without relying on subjective forecasts of future values that might not end up holding water.
The A stands for “Annual Earnings”. This indicates that one should look at whether or not a company has shown a good consistent growth over a period of years. Clearly, this implies that companies with a history of at least a few years tend to be in better standing in the CANSLIM method. However, there’s something of an exception…
Recently, we’ve been discussing a host of
However, it isn’t just about picking those companies that pay out the highest yearly dividends. Good


